<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High security with Comodo firewall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drsafemode.com/2008/01/21/comodo-free-firewall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drsafemode.com/2008/01/21/comodo-free-firewall/</link>
	<description>Currently blogging tech and tips on computer security threats.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 07:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nichelle Jaffe</title>
		<link>http://www.drsafemode.com/2008/01/21/comodo-free-firewall/comment-page-1/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Nichelle Jaffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drsafemode.com/2008/01/21/comodo-free-firewall/#comment-671</guid>
		<description>In this great scheme of things you'll receive a B- for effort. Where exactly you lost everybody was in all the facts. You know, people say, details make or break the argument.. And it couldn't be much more accurate right here. Having said that, permit me say to you precisely what did work. Your authoring is incredibly convincing which is possibly why I am taking an effort in order to opine. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Next, although I can easily see a jumps in reason you make, I am not necessarily confident of just how you appear to unite the details which in turn make your final result. For right now I will yield to your position however wish in the near future you actually link your dots better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this great scheme of things you&#8217;ll receive a B- for effort. Where exactly you lost everybody was in all the facts. You know, people say, details make or break the argument.. And it couldn&#8217;t be much more accurate right here. Having said that, permit me say to you precisely what did work. Your authoring is incredibly convincing which is possibly why I am taking an effort in order to opine. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Next, although I can easily see a jumps in reason you make, I am not necessarily confident of just how you appear to unite the details which in turn make your final result. For right now I will yield to your position however wish in the near future you actually link your dots better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.drsafemode.com/2008/01/21/comodo-free-firewall/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 02:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drsafemode.com/2008/01/21/comodo-free-firewall/#comment-301</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Host Intrusion Detection System...&lt;/strong&gt;

Intriguing idea, but I don't know if I believe you one hundred percent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Host Intrusion Detection System&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Intriguing idea, but I don&#8217;t know if I believe you one hundred percent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

